Pennsyvania Man's "Free-Riding" Scheme Crashes! $1.5 Million Fraud Fails!

SEC v. Rey D. Acosta — U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission Litigation Release No. 26261, dated March 6, 2025.

The SEC charged Rey D. Acosta with a fraudulent "free-riding" scheme. Acosta allegedly transferred $1.5 million from an unfunded bank account to his brokerage account, used these non-existent funds to buy over $120,000 in stocks, and then sold them for a profit before the transfers were reversed. He consented to a final judgment permanently enjoining him from similar violations, requiring him to pay a $15,000 civil penalty, and barring him from opening new brokerage accounts without disclosing the SEC's action.

In Plain English

Imagine someone trying to buy a bunch of toys at a store using a check they know won't have enough money to cover the cost. They buy the toys, hoping to sell them for more before the store realizes the check bounced. That's kind of what Rey D. Acosta did with stocks. He moved money he didn't have into his stock trading account, bought stocks, and tried to sell them quickly for a profit before the bank caught on and reversed the fake money transfer. The SEC stepped in to stop this and made him pay a penalty.

Disclaimer: all facts are drawn from the SEC's own filings; the claims described are allegations unless and until a court rules or the parties settle, and some cases end in dismissal.

How the Alleged Scheme Worked

1. Fabricate Funds Rey D. Acosta initiated a series of transfers totaling $1.5 million from a bank account that he knew had insufficient funds to cover the transactions.
2. Deposit Fake Funds These fraudulent transfers were directed into Acosta's brokerage account, creating a false appearance of available capital for trading.
3. Execute Trades Prior to the fraudulent transfers being reversed, Acosta purchased three different stocks for a total of more than $120,000.
4. Sell for Profit Acosta then sold these purchased stocks, aiming to realize a profit from the trades made with non-existent funds.
5. Funds Reversed The bank subsequently reversed the initial $1.5 million transfers due to insufficient funds in the originating account.
6. Account Frozen Following the reversal of funds, the brokerage firm identified the fraudulent activity and closed Acosta's account.
7. Illicit Profits Blocked The closure of the account prevented Acosta from withdrawing any trading profits he may have illicitly obtained.

The Enforcement Action

On March 6, 2025, the SEC obtained a final judgment against Rey D. Acosta of Shenandoah, Pennsylvania. Acosta was charged with conducting a fraudulent "free-riding" scheme. Without admitting or denying the allegations, Acosta consented to the entry of the final judgment which permanently enjoins him from violating Exchange Act Section 10(b) and Rule 10b-5 thereunder by committing or engaging in specified actions or activities relevant to such violations. The final judgment also permanently enjoins him from opening a brokerage account without first providing to the relevant brokerage firm(s) a copy of the Commission’s filed complaint in this matter and final judgment, and requires him to pay a $15,000 civil penalty.

Named in this action: Rey D. Acosta.

Original SEC litigation release ↗ · Browse all cases