Client Cash Used as Collateral for Loans! $400 Million Vanishes!

SEC v. Brite Advisors USA, Inc. — U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission Litigation Release No. 26329, dated June 17, 2025.

The SEC charged Brite Advisors USA, Inc. with violating custody and disclosure rules. Brite USA failed to safeguard client assets held by its Australian affiliate and did not fully disclose risks and conflicts of interest related to the use of these assets. The firm ultimately consented to a final judgment, permanently enjoining it from violating securities laws and prohibiting it from acting as an investment adviser.

In Plain English

Imagine you hired a financial helper to manage your money. This helper used a different company, located in Australia, to hold your money safely. However, the helper didn't follow the rules for making sure your money was truly safe. They also didn't tell you that the Australian company was borrowing money, using your funds as collateral, which was risky. Because of these mistakes and lack of honesty, the helper is now banned from managing money.

Disclaimer: all facts are drawn from the SEC's own filings; the claims described are allegations unless and until a court rules or the parties settle, and some cases end in dismissal.

How the Alleged Scheme Worked

1. Advising Clients to Use a Related Custodian Brite Advisors USA, Inc. (Brite USA) recommended to its clients that they use a related firm, Brite Advisors Pty Ltd. in Australia (Brite Australia), as the custodian for their assets. Brite USA advised on nearly $400 million in client assets maintained by Brite Australia.
2. Failing to Obtain Custody Reports Since 2019, Brite USA failed to comply with the SEC's custody rule. Specifically, it did not obtain an internal control report regarding the safeguarding of client funds and securities held by Brite Australia.
3. Undisclosed Use of Client Assets as Collateral The complaint alleged that Brite USA breached its fiduciary duties by failing to fully disclose material risks and conflicts of interest. This included the fact that Brite Australia borrowed millions of dollars.
4. Client Assets Funded Related Companies The borrowed funds, secured by Brite USA's client assets held in Australia, were used to provide operational funding to Brite USA and other related companies, a significant conflict of interest that was not adequately disclosed.

The Enforcement Action

On June 4, 2025, the SEC obtained a final judgment by consent against Brite Advisors USA, Inc. The judgment permanently enjoins Brite USA from violating Section 206(2) of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 and Rule 206(4)-2 thereunder. It also imposes a conduct-based injunction permanently barring Brite USA from acting as an investment adviser.

Named in this action: Brite Advisors USA, Inc..

Original SEC litigation release ↗ · Browse all cases