SEC v. Edwin Emmett Lickiss, Jr. — U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission Litigation Release No. 26360, dated July 22, 2025.
The SEC charged Edwin Emmett Lickiss, Jr. with operating a $12.7 million Ponzi scheme for over 25 years. He allegedly defrauded approximately 80 investors by promising high-yield government bonds but instead used new investors' money to pay earlier investors or for personal expenses. The SEC is seeking permanent injunctions, disgorgement, and civil penalties.
Imagine someone promising to invest your money in a super-secret, high-paying government bond deal. But instead of actually investing it, they take money from new people who give them money and use that to pay off the people who invested earlier. They also use some of the money for themselves. This is like a house of cards – it only works as long as new people keep giving money, and eventually, it all collapses.
Disclaimer: all facts are drawn from the SEC's own filings; the claims described are allegations unless and until a court rules or the parties settle, and some cases end in dismissal.
On July 21, 2025, the Securities and Exchange Commission charged Danville, California resident Edwin Emmett Lickiss, Jr., with selling fraudulent promissory note investments to approximately 80 investors as part of a Ponzi scheme that lasted over 25 years. According to the SEC’s complaint, between 1998 and August 2024, Lickiss fraudulently offered and sold to investors approximately $12.7 million in promissory notes, which purported to pay interest rates of between 9 and 32 percent per annum. The complaint alleges that Lickiss falsely represented to investors that their monies would be invested in limited opportunity, high-yield government bonds or other high-yield investment opportunities to which only he had select access. In reality, as alleged, Lickiss used money from new investors to make Ponzi payments to earlier investors or for his personal expenses. The complaint, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, charges Lickiss with violating Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder. The complaint seeks permanent injunctive relief, including conduct-based injunctions against Lickiss, disgorgement with prejudgment interest, and a civil penalty. In a parallel action, the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Northern District of California announced charges against Lickiss.
Named in this action: Edwin Emmett Lickiss, Jr..