SEC v. Pathyam Patel — U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission Litigation Release No. 26406, dated September 22, 2025.
The SEC charged Pathyam Patel with defrauding at least 15 individuals out of over $430,000. Patel allegedly misrepresented his company's qualifications, guaranteed investment principal, and promised to invest in stocks, options, and crypto. Instead, he misappropriated funds for personal expenses and Ponzi-like payments, also charging bogus fees.
Imagine someone told you they were a super-smart investor, licensed by the government, and could make your money grow safely, even guaranteeing you wouldn't lose it. You give them your savings, but instead of investing it, they spend it on themselves and pay off other people they tricked earlier. They might even invent fake fees to take more of your money. That's what this case is about.
Disclaimer: all facts are drawn from the SEC's own filings; the claims described are allegations unless and until a court rules or the parties settle, and some cases end in dismissal.
The SEC charged Pathyam Patel with fraud. Patel agreed to settle the charges, consenting to a final judgment that would permanently enjoin him from violating antifraud provisions of the Securities Act of 1933, the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the Investment Advisers Act of 1940. He would also be enjoined for five years from acting as or being associated with any investment advisor, and from participating in the issuance, purchase, offer, or sale of any security (except for personal trading). The SEC's investigation was conducted by Jennifer Miller and David Medway, with assistance from John V. Donnelly III, and supervised by Kingdon Kase, Gregory R. Bockin, and Scott A. Thompson. The SEC appreciated the assistance of the Alabama Securities Commission.
Named in this action: Pathyam Patel.